https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 22 14:40:59 2019
New Revision: 269874
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269874&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/87481
* doc/invoke.texi (-fconstexpr-ops-limit=): D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45977
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45977&action=edit
gcc9-pr87481.patch
Updated patch based on mailing list and IRC feedback.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
On
struct thread {
template thread(F) { }
};
template
void sleep_for(D) { }
template struct duration { };
using milliseconds = duration;
void f()
{
thread sleeper([]{
while (true) {
for (unsi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.4 |7.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
There is actually nothing weird on that, with smaller ones we terminate the
inner loop early and then stop.
With the debugging -O0 build I have around, the constexpr processing is very
slow though, so I get a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code,
10 matches
Mail list logo
