https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87241
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, that's why I changed the status from UNCONFIRMED to NEW.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87241
--- Comment #2 from Li Peng ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> __cxa_demangle in cp-demangle.c correctly returns -2 (the mangled name is
> not valid) but cplus_demangle in cplus-dem.c tries to allocate crazy amounts
> of memory.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87241
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
