https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84816
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84816
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Lesnikov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Dmitry Lesnikov from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > > signed overflow is undefined behavior at runtime.
> >
> > f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84816
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Lesnikov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Dmitry Lesnikov from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > > signed overflow is undefined behavior at runtime.
> >
> > f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84816
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Dmitry Lesnikov from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > signed overflow is undefined behavior at runtime.
>
> for(int i=0; i<10; i++)
>
> this loop is correct.
But t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84816
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Lesnikov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> signed overflow is undefined behavior at runtime.
for(int i=0; i<10; i++)
this loop is correct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84816
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84816
Dmitry Lesnikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84816
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_84 |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
