https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
Elmar Stellnberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
--- Comment #10 from Elmar Stellnberger ---
Created attachment 43557
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43557&action=edit
fixed version of auxtypes.h which works under g++ and clang
Well if I fix things for clang then the code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
--- Comment #9 from Elmar Stellnberger ---
I still do not understand why this constructor gets called: inline xstrbuf(
base_str s ). If I use .as_const() the result should be an xstr_const : public
xstr_abstract and not an xstr_mutable: public
xs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
--- Comment #8 from Elmar Stellnberger ---
concerning comment #4: Why do I not get the warning of utf8len being used
uninitialized? I have compiled with -Wall and -Wmaybe-uninitialized. This would
not be the first time that g++ does not notify m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Elmar Stellnberger from comment #0)
> Things work well however if I use the standard constructor instead of an
> assignment:
>
> inline xstrbuf( base_str_const s ) : base_str(
> const_cast(s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
--- Comment #3 from Elmar Stellnberger ---
if I unify the implicit copy constructor with my own one then it also works for
g++: xstr_mutable( const xstr& s ) : xstr(s) {}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
--- Comment #2 from Elmar Stellnberger ---
Princess17b29a just found out that the problem can be resolved by adding the
const keyword to the constructor in line 233:
inline xstrbuf( const xstrbuf& s ) ...
... as neither "xstrbuf( base_str_const s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
Elmar Stellnberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #43542|0 |1
is obsolete|
12 matches
Mail list logo
