https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84518
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84518
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.4 |8.5
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84518
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It got fixed with r269292 in particular.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84518
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P4
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84518
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84518
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84518
--- Comment #1 from Volker Reichelt ---
A modified testcase produces a slightly different stack-trace:
template void foo()
{
T x[=];
[&x]{};
}
bug.cc: In function 'vo
