https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.2 |9.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> So should this ideally read:
> return type ‘T’ {aka ‘class std::tuple’} is incomplete
> to express both the name the code used, and the underlying type?
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
As I understand it, "using" is a more modern form of typedef (e.g. with
template support).
So should this ideally read:
return type ‘T’ {aka ‘class std::tuple’} is incomplete
to express both the name the c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
11 matches
Mail list logo
