https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82736
--- Comment #4 from Federico Kircheis ---
Thank you very much for your feedback.
With "-static" or "-static-libstdc++" i got the expected (at least for me)
result.
I guess that I'll need to register to https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ to ask
if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82736
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This might also be due to how glibc defines the clock_gettime symbol (as a weak
alias for its internal __clock_gettime), in which case it would still belong in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ but for glibc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82736
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82736
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
First -Wl, options just pass directly to the linker. That means these options
are linker options and not gcc options. The linker which are most likely using
is the gnu linker, please this to them. But what
