https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82307
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82307
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Oct 24 13:49:13 2017
New Revision: 254046
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254046&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2017-10-24 Mukesh Kapoor
Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82307
--- Comment #6 from Mukesh Kapoor ---
Submitted fix: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg00524.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82307
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|mukesh.kapoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82307
Mukesh Kapoor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mukesh.kapoor at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82307
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The bug status was changed to NEW, that means it's been confirmed as a GCC bug
that should be fixed.
Richard was noting for other people's benefit that Clang accepts the code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82307
--- Comment #2 from Maxim ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> clang accepts it.
Yes, I know. I would like to know if the g++ is deviating from the standard,
that nothing is written about it, or will it be fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82307
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONF
