[Bug c++/82003] [5 Regression] Segmentation fault building kmymoney git sources.

2018-03-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/82003] [5 Regression] Segmentation fault building kmymoney git sources.

2017-09-17 Thread koalinux at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003 --- Comment #11 from José Pekkarinen --- Created attachment 42192 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42192&action=edit Backport of the patch to 5.X In case it helps, here is a patch that backports the revision that is supposed

[Bug c++/82003] [5 Regression] Segmentation fault building kmymoney git sources.

2017-08-29 Thread koalinux at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003 --- Comment #10 from José Pekkarinen --- Not particularly, this seems to be the only piece of software in my system that seems to use it, so I'll have to live with the elder version if this doesn't get backported. It would be awesome to be able t

[Bug c++/82003] [5 Regression] Segmentation fault building kmymoney git sources.

2017-08-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- There are a few issues with generic lambdas in GCC 5, if you need to use them you should probably just upgrade to GCC 6.

[Bug c++/82003] [5 Regression] Segmentation fault building kmymoney git sources.

2017-08-29 Thread koalinux at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003 --- Comment #8 from José Pekkarinen --- Any chance the fix would be backported to gcc 5.4.X?

[Bug c++/82003] [5 Regression] Segmentation fault building kmymoney git sources.

2017-08-29 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,