[Bug c++/71330] [6/7 Regression] Compile time regression

2016-06-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71330 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71330] [6/7 Regression] Compile time regression

2016-06-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71330 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jun 6 20:11:54 2016 New Revision: 237152 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237152&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/70847 PR c++/71330 PR c++/71393 *

[Bug c++/71330] [6/7 Regression] Compile time regression

2016-06-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71330 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jun 6 19:48:22 2016 New Revision: 237151 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237151&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/70847 PR c++/71330 PR c++/71393 *

[Bug c++/71330] [6/7 Regression] Compile time regression

2016-06-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71330 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug c++/71330] [6/7 Regression] Compile time regression

2016-05-31 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71330 --- Comment #11 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #10) > I think the problem is with cp_fold_function() which does > > cp_walk_tree (&DECL_SAVED_TREE (fndecl), cp_fold_r, NULL, NULL); > > and cp_fold_r is itself r

[Bug c++/71330] [6/7 Regression] Compile time regression

2016-05-30 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71330 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/71330] [6/7 Regression] Compile time regression

2016-05-30 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71330 --- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- - 99.25%32.38% cc1plus cc1plus[.] walk_tree_1 ▒ - 66.87% walk_tree_1

[Bug c++/71330] [6/7 Regression] Compile time regression

2016-05-30 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71330 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/71330] [6/7 Regression] Compile time regression

2016-05-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71330 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Ok, not so useful output from operf w/ frame-pointer (just ran a few minutes). Looks like it lacks any reasonable cycle handling :/ samples %image name symbol name ---

[Bug c++/71330] [6/7 Regression] Compile time regression

2016-05-30 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71330 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/71330] [6/7 Regression] Compile time regression

2016-05-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71330 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- perf reports (release checking and optimized compiler): Samples: 6M of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 5948147232538 35.46% cc1plus cc1plus[.] walk_tree_1(tree_node**, tre

[Bug c++/71330] [6/7 Regression] Compile time regression

2016-05-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71330 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog Summary|[6