subject:"\[Bug c\+\+\/71166\] \[7 Regression\] ICE with nested constexpr\/initializer"

[Bug c++/71166] [7 Regression] ICE with nested constexpr/initializer

2018-02-06 Thread lesliezhai at llvm dot org.cn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166 Leslie Zhai changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lesliezhai at llvm dot org.cn --- Comment

[Bug c++/71166] [7 Regression] ICE with nested constexpr/initializer

2017-01-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71166] [7 Regression] ICE with nested constexpr/initializer

2017-01-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166 --- Comment #14 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Jan 13 17:27:54 2017 New Revision: 244450 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244450&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/71166 * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array18.C: New t

[Bug c++/71166] [7 Regression] ICE with nested constexpr/initializer

2017-01-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/71166] [7 Regression] ICE with nested constexpr/initializer

2017-01-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/71166] [7 Regression] ICE with nested constexpr/initializer

2017-01-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P1 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug c++/71166] [7 Regression] ICE with nested constexpr/initializer

2017-01-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- At this point it is getting too late to reconsider VEC_INIT_EXPR for GCC 7, so shall we apply the fix from GCC 7 to trunk too?