https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613
--- Comment #4 from Jim Wilson ---
Author: wilson
Date: Tue May 17 18:42:16 2016
New Revision: 236339
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236339&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Make -fabi-version docs match the implementation.
gcc/
PR c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613
--- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson ---
Patch posted for review here
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00480.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613
--- Comment #2 from Jim Wilson ---
Patch posted for review here
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00480.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613
--- Comment #1 from Jim Wilson ---
I see that the patch for bug 65945 was back ported to the gcc-5 branch, which
required a partial backport of the patch for bug 44282, which added abi version
9. The original patch for 44282 is missing the doc c
