[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

2016-02-15 Thread kdudka at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 --- Comment #10 from Kamil Dudka --- It makes sense to me. Thanks for the explanation!

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

2016-02-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

2016-02-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- We for example have tem_23->hasFinalizer_ = 1; ... MEM[(struct Object *)interp_8(D) + 16B].next_ = tem_23; MEM[(struct &)tem_23] ={v} {CLOBBER}; which means that tem_23 escapes through memory pointe

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

2016-02-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

2016-02-12 Thread kdudka at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 Kamil Dudka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kdudka at redhat dot com --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

2016-02-11 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, praiskup at redhat dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 > > --- Comment #4 from Pavel Raiskup --- > Seems like -fno-tree-dse helps on Fedora.

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

2016-02-11 Thread praiskup at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Raiskup --- Seems like -fno-tree-dse helps on Fedora.

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

2016-02-11 Thread praiskup at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Raiskup --- Issue seen on Fedora 24 too: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306162

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

2016-01-30 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 --- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On January 30, 2016 8:37:59 AM GMT+01:00, "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 > >--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >Try using -fno-delete-n

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

2016-01-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Try using -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks, a lot of C++ code violates the rule about calling a class method with a null pointer.

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

2016-01-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0