https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69387
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes. This is a FAQ:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#missing_static_const_definition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69387
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Oh, now I see, you mean:
C++ Standard, Sec. 9.4.2 paragraph 4 says:
If a static data member is of const integral or const enumeration type, its
declaration in the class definition can specify a constant-ini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69387
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Do you mean that is invalid?
class StatusCode
{
public:
static const int TEST_VALUE = 0x2;
};
I thought it is like defining
const int XXX = 123; which is actually only
a #define not a linker symbol.
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69387
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
