https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68642
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That is one of the secondary uses of it, so that's fair enough!
The new implementation scales well to 100k, but won't be available until after
the 5.3 release, sorry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68642
--- Comment #3 from wmhkebe at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> N.B. 100k is not "moderately large" it's far larger than any real parameter
> pack is ever likely to be, and the primary purpose of index_sequence is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68642
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. 100k is not "moderately large" it's far larger than any real parameter
pack is ever likely to be, and the primary purpose of index_sequence is to
index into parameter packs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68642
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
