https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68409
--- Comment #5 from f3rn4nd0.c354r ---
You are both clearly right. Sorry to waist your time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68409
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Adrian Wielgosik from comment #2)
> Your operator< doesn't seem to satisfy strict weak ordering. Once I rewrote
> it to a basic but safer version:
>
> bool operator< (const chave& lhs, const c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68409
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68409
Adrian Wielgosik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adrian.wielgosik at gmail dot
com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68409
--- Comment #1 from f3rn4nd0.c354r ---
I forget to specify the compilation options used:
-std=c++11 -Wall -Wextra -save-temps
