https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.3 |5.4
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
--- Comment #10 from frankhb1989 at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #7)
> Hmm, with the static_cast, the front-end produces:
>
> < = (struct string_view &) (struct string_view
> *) NON_LVALUE_EXPR <(struct string_view &) &
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
--- Comment #9 from frankhb1989 at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> I would guess the issue is that ?: returns an rvalue (but that may not be
> 100% correct if omitting the cast works and does not warn)
In C++ ?: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
--- Comment #8 from frankhb1989 at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4)
> Return by value if you want to avoid undefined behavior.
No. This is not the point. For something like 'std::move' or 'std::forward',
can you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Version|5.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |5.2.0
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
I would guess the issue is that ?: returns an rvalue (but that may not be 100%
correct if omitting the cast works and does not warn)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
--- Comment #3 from frankhb1989 at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1)
> gcc even warns:
>
> t.cpp: In function ‘std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::string_view&
> erase_left(size_t, std::experimental::fundamentals
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
18 matches
Mail list logo
