https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67159
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Casey Carter from comment #3)
> Thanks once again, Jason. Procedural question: now that c++-concepts has
> landed on trunk, should I be tagging bug reports differently? i.e.,
> Version=6.0 and ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67159
--- Comment #3 from Casey Carter ---
Thanks once again, Jason. Procedural question: now that c++-concepts has landed
on trunk, should I be tagging bug reports differently? i.e., Version=6.0 and
maybe "[concepts]" in the title?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67159
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67159
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Aug 8 22:01:29 2015
New Revision: 226738
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226738&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67159
* constraint.cc (finish_template_introduction
