[Bug c++/66644] Rejects C++11 in-class anonymous union members initialization

2016-04-29 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66644] Rejects C++11 in-class anonymous union members initialization

2016-04-29 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Apr 30 00:00:51 2016 New Revision: 235662 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235662&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2016-04-29 Paolo Carlini PR c++/66644 *

[Bug c++/66644] Rejects C++11 in-class anonymous union members initialization

2016-04-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.0 |6.2 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug c++/66644] Rejects C++11 in-class anonymous union members initialization

2015-07-08 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/66644] Rejects C++11 in-class anonymous union members initialization

2015-06-25 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug c++/66644] Rejects C++11 in-class anonymous union members initialization

2015-06-24 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler --- The problem also exists in the current HEAD (Tested for gcc HEAD 6.0.0 20150623 (experimental))

[Bug c++/66644] Rejects C++11 in-class anonymous union members initialization

2015-06-23 Thread bisqwit at iki dot fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644 --- Comment #1 from Joel Yliluoma --- The last code piece should have test2{0,0}; there. Something ate a couple of characters off the end of that line.