[Bug c++/65291] mention that default arguments of constructors are not inherited

2015-03-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65291 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- We could potentially add a note saying that the default constructor is suppressed by the presence of another user-declared constructor, but that's unrelated to inheriting constructors, and should be a separ

[Bug c++/65291] mention that default arguments of constructors are not inherited

2015-03-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65291 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65291] mention that default arguments of constructors are not inherited

2015-03-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65291 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #5 from Jonatha

[Bug c++/65291] mention that default arguments of constructors are not inherited

2015-03-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65291 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #3) > BTW, clang rejects the 'using': > > 10 : error: using declaration cannot refer to a constructor You need to compile as C++11.

[Bug c++/65291] mention that default arguments of constructors are not inherited

2015-03-03 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65291 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|