[Bug c++/64735] std::future broken on armel

2016-11-05 Thread suokkos at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735 Pauli changed: What|Removed |Added CC||suokkos at gmail dot com --- Comment #7 from Pau

[Bug c++/64735] std::future broken on armel

2015-01-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Bastiaan Jacques from comment #5) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > > i.e. it's not broken, it's missing, and that's by design. > > So is it the intention of the GCC developers

[Bug c++/64735] std::future broken on armel

2015-01-23 Thread bastiaan at bjacques dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735 --- Comment #5 from Bastiaan Jacques --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > i.e. it's not broken, it's missing, and that's by design. So is it the intention of the GCC developers that program writers targeting such platforms simply

[Bug c++/64735] std::future broken on armel

2015-01-23 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libstdc++ |c++ --- Comment #4 from Ramana Ra