https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1aafdd7c93226cb092b560462028394a82f404a2
commit r8-9990-g1aafdd7c93226cb092b560462028394a82f404a2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:30:38 2019
New Revision: 279662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279662&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-29 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 29 09:10:44 2019
New Revision: 278832
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278832&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60228
* parser.c (cp_parser_omp_declare_reduction_e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 29 09:08:46 2019
New Revision: 278831
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278831&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60228
* parser.c (cp_parser_omp_declare_reduction_e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228
--- Comment #5 from Steffen Seckler ---
(In reply to Steffen Seckler from comment #4)
> I would also like to see this supported, as the intel compiler is already
> able to support this.
fyi: the clang compiler will support lambdas inside of
#pra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228
steffen.seckler at tum dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steffen.seckler at tum dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
Would it make sense to reject the testcase a little more gracefully? Or even
accept is as an extension?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I would not call this valid, because OpenMP 4.0 doesn't support C++11, thus
using C++11 constructs inside of OpenMP constructs is invalid.
12 matches
Mail list logo