https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
emsr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
--- Comment #15 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: emsr
Date: Tue Jul 1 05:30:34 2014
New Revision: 212188
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212188&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
2014-06-28 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
--- Comment #14 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: emsr
Date: Tue Jul 1 03:13:17 2014
New Revision: 212186
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212186&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
2014-06-28 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
--- Comment #12 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
Created attachment 33019
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33019&action=edit
Patch 58781, 59867, 60249, ...
I think I got it.
Don't mess with the token stre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
--- Comment #13 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
Created attachment 33020
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33020&action=edit
Patch 58781, 59867, 60249, ...
I think I got it.
Don't mess with the token stre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
--- Comment #11 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
This may be related to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58781 -
another decltype user-defined literal bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
--- Comment #10 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
Right now, -std=c++1y means anything after c++11. Does anyone have an idea
about what happens when C++14 and these other TSen actually come out?
I guess I was thinking as far a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini ---
Tuesday works for me ;) Seriously, thanks for looking into this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
--- Comment #8 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
I put this in a while back because it looked like it was going into C++14. I
jumped to gun. Unfortunately, I am not on a place where I can look at this
until Tuesday.
It should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
--- Comment #7 from Username ---
I've heard that it was previously expected to be in C++14, though it was
somehow forgotten, because the fix is quite small and one could currently do it
with a little bit of preprocessor/constexpr (MPLLIBS_STRING i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini ---
I went through the formal motions passed in Bristol and Chicago and didn't see
it, thus shouldn't be in C++14. C++17 maybe, nothing is decided yet.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emsr at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
In fact current clang accepts the code as a GNU extension and we don't ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This looks just as a missed diagnostics of invalid source.
Both in C++11 and in n3690 there is in [over.literal]/5:
"The declaration of a literal operator template shall have an empty
parameter-declaration-cla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59867
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
16 matches
Mail list logo
