http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59056
--- Comment #9 from Walter Mascarenhas ---
1) I just wrote that Richard's paragraph, IN ITSELF,
does not explain why things are as they are. I did not
write that there aren't other reasons to justify the
standard's decisions.
2) As I wrote, GCC d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59056
--- Comment #8 from Richard Smith ---
(In reply to Walter Mascarenhas from comment #7)
> In itself, Richard's paragraph "Morally, the function should ambiguous... "
> implies that the code below is ambiguous. However, it
> compiles just fine with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59056
--- Comment #7 from Walter Mascarenhas ---
In itself, Richard's paragraph "Morally, the function should ambiguous... "
implies that the code below is ambiguous. However, it
compiles just fine with gcc 4.8.1, because gcc also takes into
account the
