[Bug c++/58999] sizeof ...(T) is very slow than clang

2025-01-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58999 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58999] sizeof ...(T) is very slow than clang

2019-06-25 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58999 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/58999] sizeof ...(T) is very slow than clang

2013-11-05 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58999 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini --- Probably a meta-bug about this sort of issue would also make sense. We have got a few bugs already.

[Bug c++/58999] sizeof ...(T) is very slow than clang

2013-11-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58999 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- --enable-checking=release makes quite a big difference $ time ~/gcc/4.x/bin/g++ -std=c++11 -c t.cc -ftime-report Execution times (seconds) phase setup : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.01 ( 2%) sys 0.

[Bug c++/58999] sizeof ...(T) is very slow than clang

2013-11-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58999 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/58999] sizeof ...(T) is very slow than clang

2013-11-05 Thread vhaisman at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58999 --- Comment #2 from Václav Zeman --- You should probably add the complete test case as an attachment.

[Bug c++/58999] sizeof ...(T) is very slow than clang

2013-11-05 Thread khurshid.normuradov at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58999 khurshid changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://stackoverflow.com/qu