http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
--- Comment #9 from vincent.legoll at gmail dot com ---
OK I reproduced it again, and it is a duplicatre from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58006
I verified that by just recompilking the offending file without the
-ftree-parallelize-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
--- Comment #7 from vincent.legoll at gmail dot com ---
Grrr, I cannot reproduce the original bug, something must have changed during
my attempts at "fixing" the problem...
Sorry for the noise.
I'll come back here if I ever met that problem again.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
--- Comment #6 from vincent.legoll at gmail dot com ---
OK with the gcc-4.8 from debian unstable the preprocessed output does compile
whereas with the one from testing it does not.
I'll try to reproduce the bug within the vegastrike build chain ne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
--- Comment #1 from vincent.legoll at gmail dot com ---
This was with modifications I made to the codebase, I'll investigate what the
culprit is...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
--- Comment #3 from vincent.legoll at gmail dot com ---
No, sorry for the uninformative comment
The source code modifications I spoke about are to vegastrike source code and
cmake build chain, but I have a hard time finding the root cause...
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
I can't reproduce the ICE with stock FSF GCC 4.8.0, 4.8.1, mainline. Tried
various optimization levels too.
Or are you saying that you are using a modified *GCC*?!?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
--- Comment #5 from vincent.legoll at gmail dot com ---
I'll see if I can get a debian package for a more up to date gcc-4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|vincent.legoll at gmail dot com|
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini
