http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58362
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58362
--- Comment #12 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Sep 9 13:39:47 2013
New Revision: 202402
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202402&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-09-09 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58362
* error.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58362
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|hubicka at uc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58362
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini ---
Nope, sorry, the C front-end is already fine, thus I guess we really want to
change location_of in the C++ front-end.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58362
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini ---
I sent the simple patch and apparently people would rather prefer fixing
location_of to not do t = DECL_CONTEXT (t) for PARM_DECLs, likewise the C
front-end of course, in such a way that '+' works and we don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58362
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz
--- Comment #8 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58362
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58362
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #4)
> The damage happens at error.c:3435.
Yes, location_of replaces the declaration of the argument with that of the
function :-(
> Should we just use "%qD", no '+' ?
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58362
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58362
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
The damage happens at error.c:3435. Should we just use "%qD", no '+' ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58362
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Oh I see, but that should be rather easy to track down.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58362
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #1)
> Maybe it's just me, but I don't understand what -ignored- means in this
> context, could you please explain?
It means that the diagnostic machinery takes the column
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58362
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
Maybe it's just me, but I don't understand what -ignored- means in this
context, could you please explain?
13 matches
Mail list logo
