http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58191
--- Comment #6 from Danil Ilinykh ---
Thank you!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58191
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #2)
> Francois, did we change anything in the library for 4.8.x?
I think that Francois added more iterator concept checking and this one looks
correct. Unfortunately I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58191
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58191
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler ---
First, this issue should be categorized as belonging to the component
"libstdc++", not to "c++".
Second, the defect report is invalid, because std::upper_bound requires a
minimum iterator category of "forwar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58191
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58191
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58191
--- Comment #1 from Danil Ilinykh ---
Created attachment 30671
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30671&action=edit
Preprocessed file archive