[Bug c++/57917] -Wuninitialized

2013-07-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57917 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Your code is equivalent to: int i; // uninitialized i = 1; // now it's initialized This should not give a warning.

[Bug c++/57917] -Wuninitialized

2013-07-17 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57917 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/57917] -Wuninitialized

2013-07-17 Thread nishant.031 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57917 Nishant Sharma changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug c++/57917] -Wuninitialized

2013-07-17 Thread nishant.031 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57917 --- Comment #2 from Nishant Sharma --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > GCC 4.2 is ancient and no longer supported. > > This is not "critical", it's your code that has a bug, not the compiler. > > You don't use A::isABC in the pro

[Bug c++/57917] -Wuninitialized

2013-07-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57917 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/57917] -Wuninitialized

2013-07-17 Thread nishant.031 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57917 Nishant Sharma changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical