http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57509
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57509
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57509
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini ---
I see, I never fiddled with those.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57509
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #5)
> Detail: normally we just pass around tsubst_flags_ts, no complain & tf_error
> to bool, etc.
Those flags are not available in c-family, this is not the first place
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57509
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini ---
Detail: normally we just pass around tsubst_flags_ts, no complain & tf_error to
bool, etc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57509
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
Created attachment 30281
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30281&action=edit
Untested patch
There are quite a few issues with the c++ version...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57509
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Thanks Marc. Please take your own plan very seriously! ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57509
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57509
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
