https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
r0-123716-g2e6491515ec153
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini ---
No, rather different issues.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419
--- Comment #5 from David Krauss ---
Does this also fix #57429?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419
--- Comment #2 from David Krauss ---
I guess the proper terminology would be taking its pointer. Nonstatic members
don't really have addresses. Anyway what I was doing was determining the
argument of a functor with one operator() overload using &f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|