[Bug c++/57419] Access control doesn't stop referring to a deleted function

2025-03-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- r0-123716-g2e6491515ec153

[Bug c++/57419] Access control doesn't stop referring to a deleted function

2013-06-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini --- No, rather different issues.

[Bug c++/57419] Access control doesn't stop referring to a deleted function

2013-06-03 Thread potswa at mac dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419 --- Comment #5 from David Krauss --- Does this also fix #57429?

[Bug c++/57419] Access control doesn't stop referring to a deleted function

2013-06-03 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/57419] Access control doesn't stop referring to a deleted function

2013-06-02 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c++/57419] Access control doesn't stop referring to a deleted function

2013-05-29 Thread potswa at mac dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419 --- Comment #2 from David Krauss --- I guess the proper terminology would be taking its pointer. Nonstatic members don't really have addresses. Anyway what I was doing was determining the argument of a functor with one operator() overload using &f

[Bug c++/57419] Access control doesn't stop referring to a deleted function

2013-05-28 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|