https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57176
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57176
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57176
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse 2013-05-06 13:44:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Do you have a link to the discussion, or happen to remember the arguments?
> > I can see that there are more possible iss
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57176
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler
2013-05-06 13:11:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Do you have a link to the discussion, or happen to remember the arguments?
> I can see that there are more possible issues with the parameter (it lives
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57176
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2013-05-06 12:52:41
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Unless I'm misunderstanding your suggestion I think that a compiler is not
> allowed to apply copy-elision here, because that case was explicitly exclud
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57176
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
