https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57082
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57082
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0, 9.2.1
Known to fail|10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57082
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 13 05:10:11 2019
New Revision: 279335
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279335&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/57082 - new X{} and private destructor.
build_new_1 alread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57082
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 11 16:51:09 2019
New Revision: 279236
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279236&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/57082 - new X{} and private destructor.
build_new_1 alread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57082
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57082
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to lucdanton from comment #1)
> Using a very similar testcase I bisected the issue to r239783:
>
> //--
> struct no_destr {
> no_destr() = default;
> protected:
> ~no_destr() = de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57082
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Stephane Kaloustian from comment #3)
> In my understanding, this is related to the creation of a copy.
> Using g++ (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4):
No, that's a completely different is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57082
Stephane Kaloustian changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stephane.kaloustian@optimo-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57082
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57082
lucdanton at free dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lucdanton at free dot fr
--- C
10 matches
Mail list logo