https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56976
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56976
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56976
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to Akim Demaille from comment #2)
You are right, I misread your code example in the haste. I agree that this is
not related to CWG 1604 (we have no mixed case) and I think it is clear that
both init
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56976
--- Comment #2 from Akim Demaille ---
Maybe I don't know, even after having read several times the section you
pointed me to. In particular I see nothing there which could explain why using
foo() instead of foo{} would give different results.
FW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56976
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|