http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-18
03:51:11 UTC ---
Now that 4.8.0 is about to be released, I'm reluctant to backport
non-regression C++11 fixes to 4.7.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222
Michael Bruck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruck.michael at googlemail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-08
16:03:57 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 8 16:03:48 2013
New Revision: 196549
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196549
Log:
PR c++/51494
PR c++/51884
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler
2013-02-06 11:42:21 UTC ---
The code looks valid to me, I don't see any reason for capturing something
here. The expression "&Test::y" should be valid in that scope and returns an
rvalue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
