https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55319
m101010a at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55319
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-19
00:16:03 UTC ---
If it does depend on I/O please trim down all the rest, and, if at all
possible, please use standard functions for that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55319
--- Comment #2 from m101010a at gmail dot com 2012-11-18 22:13:23 UTC ---
Actually, it does depend on IO; the optimizations aren't performed in either
case if I declare but don't define putchar, and if do something simple like
assigning to a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55319
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-18
14:00:37 UTC ---
In order to quickly make progress on the issue, I recommend filing something
much smaller and less obfuscated. Also, not using internal stdio interfaces
(anyway, very likely i/o
