http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54893
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54893
--- Comment #3 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-11 19:54:11 UTC ---
I agree with Michael. Accesses to volative vars are disallowed in safe code,
but relaxed transactions can run unsafe code (after going irrevocable). The
test case i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54893
--- Comment #2 from Mike Spear 2012-10-11
13:21:19 UTC ---
There is a key difference here. The transaction in my example is /relaxed/.
According to the specification, there are no restrictions on what a relaxed
transaction can do. Relax
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54893
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pmarlier at gcc dot gnu.org
--
