http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
--- Comment #8 from Andy Jost 2012-11-20
17:14:18 UTC ---
The workaround I mentioned in comment #5 does seem to do the trick.
Specifically, something like this works in all the cases I've tried:
struct MainNode : Node
{
virtua
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-17
12:27:15 UTC ---
It is just that though, a workaround, it doesn't workaround say:
void bar (char *);
int baz ();
int
foo ()
{
{
char buf[64];
bar (buf);
}
return baz ();
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-16
23:06:16 UTC ---
In terms of workarounds, what about using -std=c++11?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
--- Comment #5 from Andy Jost 2012-10-02
15:25:46 UTC ---
Most of the technical discussion is over my head, I'm afraid. Is there a
simple workaround? What if the body of H contains only a call to a
non-inlineable function to do its work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-02
13:31:24 UTC ---
Right now we only have control flow insensitive points to ESCAPED set, so I'm
afraid this is unfixable, unless we change that. Only with control flow
sensitive ESCAPED we'd be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Steve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-02
00:37:30 UTC ---
4.5.2 is no longer maintained so won't be fixed in any case - could you check
whether the problem still exists in a current release, i.e. 4.6+, preferably
checking the trunk (
