[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fox at ucw dot cz --- Comment #16 from

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.4 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill --- The patch does seem safe enough for 4.7, even though I usually prefer not to backport C++11 fixes to older release series.

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 James Y Knight changed: What|Removed |Added CC||foom at fuhm dot net --- Comment #13 fro

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 --- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03 16:01:43 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Dec 3 16:01:32 2012 New Revision: 194098 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194098 Log: /cp 2012-12-03 Paolo Carli

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-06 08:32:28 UTC --- I think those errors indicate you don't have Flex installed

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 --- Comment #8 from bekenn at yopmail dot com 2012-08-06 08:11:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > If submitter can try current 4_7-branch or mainline, it would be easy for him > to double check. I installed mint in a virtual machine to test tho

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 bekenn at yopmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27935|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 --- Comment #5 from bekenn at yopmail dot com 2012-08-06 04:44:17 UTC --- Created attachment 27948 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27948 Full application showing issue. Sorry for the wait. Here is a complete program showing th

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-08-04 11:37:12 UTC --- If submitter can try current 4_7-branch or mainline, it would be easy for him to double check.

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-08-04 11:35:34 UTC --- Indeed, I suspected that immediately. But without a self contained testcase not requiring inspection of the assembly personally I'm not 100% sure (and I'm in the middle of 2-3 other th

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-04 10:47:49 UTC --- Dup of PR 52988?

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|