http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53173
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-01
09:41:34 UTC ---
Also, please give more useful bug descriptions, "PROD02" is completely
meaningless
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53173
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-01
09:40:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> 4. error: no matching function for call to ‘make_pair(std::string&,
> std::string&)’
If you're calling make_pair with an explicit template argument list e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53173
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53173
--- Comment #2 from gcc 2012-04-30 20:31:49 UTC
---
Thanks Marc !
Sorry on missing most words in few error lines.
2. error: no matching function for call to ‘std::pair >::pair(long unsigned int, const
a::b::c::Config*)’
5. error: declaration o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53173
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2012-04-30
20:02:59 UTC ---
Uh, where are you reporting a bug in gcc?
(In reply to comment #0)
> I am trying to upgrade (GCC) 4.4.0 to (GCC) 4.6.2. I see bunch of
> incompatible
> error from code which works wit
