http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53067
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-11
22:21:50 UTC ---
Turns out I was wrong in my last message! Francois made me notice that in fact
in my experiments I was reverting the quick hack in an incorrect way. I have
now properly done the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53067
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53067
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53067
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-22 17:38:18 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Apr 22 17:38:11 2012
New Revision: 186677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186677
Log:
2012-04-22 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53067
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-22 17:38:07 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Apr 22 17:37:57 2012
New Revision: 186676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186676
Log:
2012-04-22 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53067
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53067
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-04-22
16:10:38 UTC ---
I'm right now rebuilding both mainline and branch, because yesterday both
worked and I don't think we changed anything in this area. What the heck it is?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53067
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53067
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
