https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52985
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60858
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60858&action=edit
Easy running testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52985
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
So what is interesting is at -O2 (but not -O1 or -O0) GCC 3.4.6 worked.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52985
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60858|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52985
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> > Created attachment 60858 [details]
> > Easy running testcase
>
> With this, we can make it a regression (5.5 works)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52985
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Created attachment 60858 [details]
> Easy running testcase
With this, we can make it a regression (5.5 works)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52985
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-04-16 00:00:00 |2021-8-1
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52985
Roland Wintersteller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roland.wintersteller@wallne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52985
--- Comment #2 from Will Benfold 2012-04-18 18:08:16
UTC ---
Another test case; this one doesn't need any headers and also cuts out the
loop. The exit status should always be 1, but in fact it's 0 if no
command-line args are supplied and 1 other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52985
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
