http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51723
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-01
18:30:08 UTC ---
Oops, you are right, will do.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51723
--- Comment #6 from andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk 2012-01-01 15:25:50 UTC ---
As a suggestion, the test case added in commit
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=182768 should have the
additional two lines:
constexpr B b1 = A<10, 20,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51723
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51723
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-01 13:31:51 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Jan 1 13:31:48 2012
New Revision: 182768
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182768
Log:
2012-01-01 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51723
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51723
--- Comment #2 from andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk 2012-01-01 13:05:50 UTC ---
I have double-checked and, yes, it does work in the latest revision from trunk
- sorry, I ought to have checked that first.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51723
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
