https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51180
trashyankes at wp dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51180
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini ---
Dodji, any progress on this? Looks like Part 1 of the latest patch set still
needs work? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00728.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51180
--- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-12-03
17:25:02 UTC ---
A candidate patch for this has been submitted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00163.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51180
--- Comment #4 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-12-02 10:15:06 UTC ---
"jason at gcc dot gnu.org" a écrit:
> I'm surprised that it doesn't just work already; writing t2 already
> works, doing the substitution ought to work the same way.
It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51180
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51180
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51180
--- Comment #1 from trashyankes at wp dot pl 2011-11-23 18:34:43 UTC ---
I find easy workaround this bug.
---
---
template class M>
struct m
{
template
struct _inner_fix
{
typedef
