http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50956
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50956
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-02 18:04:53 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Nov 2 18:04:48 2011
New Revision: 180786
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180786
Log:
2011-11-02 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50956
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|paolo.carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50956
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-11-02
13:15:35 UTC ---
Well, we shouldn't early return error_mark_node, however.
Also, in the specific case at issue here we are still failing to warn, because
we return from build_static_cast_1 pretty earl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50956
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50956
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50956
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f