http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50611
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50611
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-11 13:07:55 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Oct 11 13:07:52 2011
New Revision: 179802
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179802
Log:
2011-10-11 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50611
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-11 13:08:09 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Oct 11 13:08:05 2011
New Revision: 179803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179803
Log:
2011-10-11 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50611
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-11
11:40:38 UTC ---
I mean, fixes the ICE both in mainline and in 4_6-branch. Indeed, the latter
seems more serious, because otherwise for the original testcase we produce no
useful diagnostics at all.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50611
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-11
11:35:42 UTC ---
I see. It does, anyway.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50611
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-11
11:20:47 UTC ---
The reduced testcase yes. But please try the original testcase in 4.6, whether
your patch fixes it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50611
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.1 |4.7.0
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50611
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-11
02:24:56 UTC ---
Hummm. This patchlet avoids the ICE and apparently passes the testsuite
(already past g++.dg), but the amount of diagnostics in mainline seems in any
case much more than in 4.6, in par
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50611
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
