subject:"\[Bug c\+\+\/49756\] g\+\+ ICE"

[Bug c++/49756] g++ ICE

2011-08-01 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49756 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49756] g++ ICE

2011-07-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49756 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-22 09:21:52 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jul 22 09:21:49 2011 New Revision: 176622 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176622 Log: PR c++/49756 * libiberty.h (stack_limit_inc

[Bug c++/49756] g++ ICE

2011-07-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49756 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-22 08:33:42 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jul 22 08:33:37 2011 New Revision: 176617 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176617 Log: PR c++/49756 * libiberty.h (stack_limit_inc

[Bug c++/49756] g++ ICE

2011-07-18 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49756 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-18 19:34:08 UTC --- Created attachment 24789 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24789 my patch

[Bug c++/49756] g++ ICE

2011-07-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49756 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-18 19:30:03 UTC --- Created attachment 24788 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24788 gcc47-pr49756.patch Untested patch. Clueless people will be still able to construct twice or 4 time

[Bug c++/49756] g++ ICE

2011-07-18 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49756 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-18 15:22:11 UTC --- For this testcase, even 30MB isn't enough, but 40MiB is, so I think I'll round up to 64MB. I think it's probably best to raise the limit in both places to avoid confusion when invokin