https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #12)
> I've suggested that we reopen DR 214 in order to make this testcase valid.
Looks like that never happened.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637
Timothy J Giese changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-05
19:51:02 UTC ---
This is related to
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_defects.html#214
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-05
19:48:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> OH. I think I see what you are saying here. I now think that you're saying
> "the partial ordering will try to deduce the arguments regardless of whether
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637
--- Comment #8 from Timothy J Giese 2011-07-05
18:02:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > Created attachment 24686 [details]
> > > minimal test case
> >
> > IMO this is ambiguous.
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637
--- Comment #7 from Timothy J Giese 2011-07-05
17:34:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Created attachment 24686 [details]
> > minimal test case
>
> IMO this is ambiguous.
> When doing partial ordering, in both c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-05
17:28:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> struct S { typedef int iterator; };
> template void F( T, U ) {}
> template void F( T, int ) {}
> int main()
> {
> S::iterator i(42);
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637
Johannes Schaub changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schaub.johannes at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637
--- Comment #4 from Timothy J Giese 2011-07-05
16:04:29 UTC ---
icpc (ICC) 11.1 20091130 compiles the original minimal test case without
warning nor error.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637
--- Comment #3 from Timothy J Giese 2011-07-05
15:40:59 UTC ---
The original minimal test case also fails to compile with g++ 4.5.1.
I can confirm that the following compiles fine with g++ 4.6.0, 4.5.1, and
4.4.3.
struct S { typedef int iterato
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637
--- Comment #1 from Timothy J Giese 2011-07-05
02:04:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 24686
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24686
minimal test case
13 matches
Mail list logo
