--- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-03 20:43 ---
Subject: Bug 4926
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 3 20:42:48 2010
New Revision: 156482
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156482
Log:
PR c++/4926
PR c++/38600
* mangle.c (writ
--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-12 04:57 ---
Actually, we have PR 38712 specifically about the template-id case, so let's go
ahead and close this PR.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.2 |4.4.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4926
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.1 |4.4.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4926
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.0 |4.4.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4926
--- Comment #13 from jason at redhat dot com 2009-04-06 15:39 ---
Subject: Re: C++ ABI needs clarification on mangling of complex
expressions
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> /export/gnu/src/gcc-work/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/foo.ii:45: sorry,
> unimplemented: mangling
--- Comment #12 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-01 18:13
---
The testcase in the first attachment still failed to compile as of
revision 145378:
[...@gnu-6 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -S
/export/gnu/src/gcc-work/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/foo.ii
/export/gnu/src/gcc-work/gcc/gc
--- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-01 18:11 ---
Subject: Bug 4926
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Apr 1 18:10:52 2009
New Revision: 145424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145424
Log:
2009-04-01 H.J. Lu
Backport from mainline:
2009-0
--- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-01 18:09 ---
Subject: Bug 4926
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Apr 1 18:09:21 2009
New Revision: 145423
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145423
Log:
2009-04-01 H.J. Lu
PR c++/4926
* g++.dg/template/
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-04-01 16:21
---
I'm sorry, where is the definition of foo? Of course it doesn't link.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4926
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-01 16:12 ---
Even though the testcase in comment #2 compiles, it fails to link:
tmp/ccsV5xgT.o: In function `main':^M
pr4926-1.C:(.text+0x5): undefined reference to `X::Type foo()'^M
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status^M
--
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-03-28 23:23 ---
It shouldn't be closed without a testcase.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-28 20:54
---
Fixed by Jason's patch
2009-03-17 Jason Merrill
* decl.c (grokfndecl): Set DECL_CONTEXT on parms.
(duplicate_decls): Adjust DECL_CONTEXT of newdecl's parms.
* pt.c (check_explicit_speci
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-03 21:18 ---
I've been dealing with mangling issues recently.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
14 matches
Mail list logo
