http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-01
18:39:43 UTC ---
Yes. Running by default the entire testsuite in debug-mode too is not an
option, would take too much time. Honestly, however, in my experience, isn't
*that* common that a front-end iss
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-01
18:07:06 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 1 18:07:03 2011
New Revision: 174539
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174539
Log:
PR c++/49253
* typeck2.c (build_x_arrow): D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-01
17:31:08 UTC ---
It seems unfortunate that make check-libstdc++-v3 doesn't catch obvious
breakage like this; at the least we could make sure that stdc++.h compiles in
debug/parallel modes?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fro
